You claim your vocab is sufficiently large that you should have known all the words, and as you suggest, exhibit a strong bias towards male-known words illuminated by the study, and therefore suspect the entire dataset is fraudulent because you didn't recognize the female-familiar words?
Is this satire? "Study showing males don't know certain things deemed completely fraudulent by person on internet technology forum. 'I would have known those things if they were real', claims person of unknown gender known as 'errcorrectcode' on forum 'hacker news'."
You claim your vocab is sufficiently large that you should have known all the words, and as you suggest, exhibit a strong bias towards male-known words illuminated by the study, and therefore suspect the entire dataset is fraudulent because you didn't recognize the female-familiar words?
Is this satire? "Study showing males don't know certain things deemed completely fraudulent by person on internet technology forum. 'I would have known those things if they were real', claims person of unknown gender known as 'errcorrectcode' on forum 'hacker news'."