The bias of this mathematician and the rest of the Royal Society working group regarding vaccination is irrelevant to the subject of these papers, which analyse how and why misinformation is spread, and how correct information can retain credibility.
Reflexively trying to discredit them while being too lazy to read beyond the headline is a great way of making your own position look highly dubious though.
Reflexively trying to discredit them while being too lazy to read beyond the headline is a great way of making your own position look highly dubious though.