At the risk of this discussion devolving into a flamewar, I would just encourage you to do your own research about this situation.
Regardless of all other arguments about location-based pay, Google et al have been paying their temporarily-remote employees 100% of their salary up until now.
These companies would need to spend lots of resources to legally navigate pay cuts to already-agreed-upon contracts.
And they would also have to weigh the risk of those employees leaving for better pay elsewhere.
Regardless of all other arguments about location-based pay, Google et al have been paying their temporarily-remote employees 100% of their salary up until now.
These companies would need to spend lots of resources to legally navigate pay cuts to already-agreed-upon contracts.
And they would also have to weigh the risk of those employees leaving for better pay elsewhere.