From the title I expected the article to inform me about why this wasn't a rogue trader, that is, some new information about this particular case.
Instead I get a long rant about the evils of investment bankers. Might be a great political point, and it was certainly a nice rant, but it had nothing to do with the title except in the broadest sense.
In short, I felt tricked to read the piece. There was only a sentence or two to directly support the title. The rest was a screed on the generic problem. This is the kind of article where people who are pissed about bankers (and I count myself among them) will read and nod their heads and totally agree with the author -- all the while forgetting that the meat of the article provides much heat, little light.
Instead I get a long rant about the evils of investment bankers. Might be a great political point, and it was certainly a nice rant, but it had nothing to do with the title except in the broadest sense.
In short, I felt tricked to read the piece. There was only a sentence or two to directly support the title. The rest was a screed on the generic problem. This is the kind of article where people who are pissed about bankers (and I count myself among them) will read and nod their heads and totally agree with the author -- all the while forgetting that the meat of the article provides much heat, little light.