How is being a landlord any more exploitative than offering any other service?
Tenants are under no obligation to rent to a given landlord or in a given area.
Your example doesn’t really make sense - someone living paycheck to paycheck would default on a mortgage even if they got one. It’s for those people that renting makes the most sense.
You originally implied that renting out property is not a job, which implies no work. To receive money for doing nothing would be “free.”
Anyway, you seem to have an irrational hatred of landlords based on falsehoods. Hopefully you can find solace.
Tenants are under no obligation to rent to a given landlord or in a given area.
Your example doesn’t really make sense - someone living paycheck to paycheck would default on a mortgage even if they got one. It’s for those people that renting makes the most sense.
You originally implied that renting out property is not a job, which implies no work. To receive money for doing nothing would be “free.”
Anyway, you seem to have an irrational hatred of landlords based on falsehoods. Hopefully you can find solace.