No, in response to someone vaguely mentioning the words “free will”, you made the claim: “Free will does not exist.”
The burden of proof is now on you to provide evidence of your claim as well as on you to define the terms contained within your claim.
I am not arguing the “free will” debate either way for the reasons mentioned previously and do not care to define the terms as the entire debate is nothing more than a creative thought experiment as far as I can tell.
No, in response to someone vaguely mentioning the words “free will”, you made the claim: “Free will does not exist.”
The burden of proof is now on you to provide evidence of your claim as well as on you to define the terms contained within your claim.
I am not arguing the “free will” debate either way for the reasons mentioned previously and do not care to define the terms as the entire debate is nothing more than a creative thought experiment as far as I can tell.