>If that centralised entity is corrupt enough to surreptitiously mutate records, immutable records that you've made arent much help
This seems like the opposite of true to me; if they intend to mutate the records doesn't it become extremely helpful that the records are immutable? What am I missing?
This seems like the opposite of true to me; if they intend to mutate the records doesn't it become extremely helpful that the records are immutable? What am I missing?