If I may sub-divert the thread to ask the experts in the field:
Do you think Nikon/Canon will have to start going down the computational photography route to make themselves more appealing to camera buyers? Or as soon as someone in the DSLR world does, they will have to quickly go along?
I.e. either downsize their cameras to be more attractive to carry hour by hour of your day, or make their features much better to compensate for the trouble of carrying a DSLR?
Or is part of the appeal of the traditional camera that effects, manipulation, etc. of the photo is not done and you're in total control of the exposure?
I have been a DSLR person at times, but honestly I am amazed at how good iPhone photos look sometimes... until I zoom in of course.
Do you think Nikon/Canon will have to start going down the computational photography route to make themselves more appealing to camera buyers? Or as soon as someone in the DSLR world does, they will have to quickly go along?
I.e. either downsize their cameras to be more attractive to carry hour by hour of your day, or make their features much better to compensate for the trouble of carrying a DSLR?
Or is part of the appeal of the traditional camera that effects, manipulation, etc. of the photo is not done and you're in total control of the exposure?
I have been a DSLR person at times, but honestly I am amazed at how good iPhone photos look sometimes... until I zoom in of course.