> as it was by a state without a mature domestic intelligence capability going to market to buy tools of one, to spy on actual spies in its borders
How do you intend to support your claim that the 11 US diplomats and employees from the US embassy are spies (and thus are supposedly legitimate targets in your view)?
Nowhere does it say US spies were the targets. And no other story on this subject has presented evidence of that either.
How do you intend to support your claim that the 11 US diplomats and employees from the US embassy are spies (and thus are supposedly legitimate targets in your view)?
Nowhere does it say US spies were the targets. And no other story on this subject has presented evidence of that either.