>A more plausible explanation is more female writers and the closely related feminization of culture.
so what is the point of this piece? is he blaming the slowdown of scientific advancement in the past 40-50 years on "femininity", or straight up just woman?
maybe I'm being overly cynical in my reading, but the inclusion of that last bit doesn't smell very well reasoned. other explanations would be great
so what is the point of this piece? is he blaming the slowdown of scientific advancement in the past 40-50 years on "femininity", or straight up just woman?
maybe I'm being overly cynical in my reading, but the inclusion of that last bit doesn't smell very well reasoned. other explanations would be great