Interesting perspective. I have subscriptions to both and my first reaction was the exact opposite of yours.
Chess.con is so far ahead of lichens that it wasn’t debatable.
What in your opinion leads you to believe that lichess is eating chess.com’s lunch.
For me games are far easier and quicker to setup with chess.com. The drills are better at chess.com and so are the lessons, both in-depth and breadth.
I can’t really think of a single thing lichess does better so I find it strange that you see things So vastly different.
Also the competition on chess.con seems far better. My Elo rank on lichess is a full 500 points higher on lichess than chess.com, so I guess some purple could consider the go cost to be a point for lichess
What do you see in lichess that i superior to chess.com?
Chess.con is so far ahead of lichens that it wasn’t debatable.
What in your opinion leads you to believe that lichess is eating chess.com’s lunch.
For me games are far easier and quicker to setup with chess.com. The drills are better at chess.com and so are the lessons, both in-depth and breadth.
I can’t really think of a single thing lichess does better so I find it strange that you see things So vastly different.
Also the competition on chess.con seems far better. My Elo rank on lichess is a full 500 points higher on lichess than chess.com, so I guess some purple could consider the go cost to be a point for lichess
What do you see in lichess that i superior to chess.com?