>These are strikers, not fired employees, and what is happening is a protest
Why is this relevant? Does being labeled as a "striker" give you additional legal rights that you wouldn't otherwise have?
>It's no different than mailing in a bunch of applications, it's just digital instead. They aren't burning down the offices
"not burning down offices" seems like a pretty low bar for acceptable conduct. that doesn't mean their behavior is legal. The obvious analogy would be: would it be legal to spam a pizza restaurant with fake orders? Or spamming a doctor/hospital with fake appointments? Or spamming police departments with fake tips?
Why is this relevant? Does being labeled as a "striker" give you additional legal rights that you wouldn't otherwise have?
>It's no different than mailing in a bunch of applications, it's just digital instead. They aren't burning down the offices
"not burning down offices" seems like a pretty low bar for acceptable conduct. that doesn't mean their behavior is legal. The obvious analogy would be: would it be legal to spam a pizza restaurant with fake orders? Or spamming a doctor/hospital with fake appointments? Or spamming police departments with fake tips?