i suppose. i suspect most financial fraud would be caught by the accountants and grant administrators at respective institutions. accounting and best practices around it have been around for a long time.
this discussion is about ensuring scientific velocity by increasing the rigor required to declare success and add new knowledge to the commons.
unless there's large scale fraud going on, i honestly don't think bringing in additional auditors to look at books that are already professionally kept is going to benefit anyone other than said auditors.
this discussion is about ensuring scientific velocity by increasing the rigor required to declare success and add new knowledge to the commons.
unless there's large scale fraud going on, i honestly don't think bringing in additional auditors to look at books that are already professionally kept is going to benefit anyone other than said auditors.