That sounds like spending money on trying to replicate results that can’t be replicated doesn’t it? Isn’t that what this study was doing? Doesn’t it make more sense to revisit how the existing funding is spent?
I have very little insight into this area of research, so I’d just have to guess everyone’s in a hurry and reaching for results or published papers.
I have very little insight into this area of research, so I’d just have to guess everyone’s in a hurry and reaching for results or published papers.