If there is an expert in immunology here I'd really like to ask a question:
Aren't antibody titers just one measure of immunity?
Since ~everyone with just two shots get them a while ago, and people receiving the boosters are receiving them now, wouldn't we expect must higher levels of neutralizing antibodies in boosted people? I know the number of antibodies fades over time, (whether from vaccine or infection) but this doesn't mean you don't have lasting protection after this, right?
Wouldn't it therefore be a mistake/misleading to conclude something specific about a level of protection from this titer data alone?
Aren't antibody titers just one measure of immunity?
Since ~everyone with just two shots get them a while ago, and people receiving the boosters are receiving them now, wouldn't we expect must higher levels of neutralizing antibodies in boosted people? I know the number of antibodies fades over time, (whether from vaccine or infection) but this doesn't mean you don't have lasting protection after this, right?
Wouldn't it therefore be a mistake/misleading to conclude something specific about a level of protection from this titer data alone?