Uh no, this is (one reason) why you want to use a (well written) decentralized exchange.
>is like giving people ACH access
I use ACH, I know nothing about it, and I'm sure I can lose all my money from using it wrong, as banks love systems that are impossible to operate securely. I don't have this problem with bitcoin, and never will.
As for the tech side, you know nothing. The bugs are simply because of the demographics behind decentralized tech:
- Before snowden: script kiddies, slightly educated hobbyists
- After snowden: all kinds of idiots
> Crypto Anarchy is a farce
Your post is a farce. Wanting basic control over your own money (and removing horrible bank insecurity and UX as a side effect) is not anarchy or anything remotely resembling it. Your post only sounds reasonable from the perspective of $current_world which is basically hyperstatist, people are literally afraid to have sex and cross the street without government approval.
>is like giving people ACH access
I use ACH, I know nothing about it, and I'm sure I can lose all my money from using it wrong, as banks love systems that are impossible to operate securely. I don't have this problem with bitcoin, and never will.
As for the tech side, you know nothing. The bugs are simply because of the demographics behind decentralized tech:
- Before snowden: script kiddies, slightly educated hobbyists
- After snowden: all kinds of idiots
> Crypto Anarchy is a farce
Your post is a farce. Wanting basic control over your own money (and removing horrible bank insecurity and UX as a side effect) is not anarchy or anything remotely resembling it. Your post only sounds reasonable from the perspective of $current_world which is basically hyperstatist, people are literally afraid to have sex and cross the street without government approval.