What, exactly, is the moral issue associated with letting the vast majority of nicks though?
I can understand banning obscenities for usernames; I can understand banning fraudsters.
But if I show up as LispNerd3K on G+ and only G+... who gives a rip? I mean, seriously.
I was going to put some serious effort into G+, kinda use it as a mini-blogging platform, but I don't really care for the anti-hacker mindset that appears to be driving policy there.
I can understand banning obscenities for usernames; I can understand banning fraudsters.
But if I show up as LispNerd3K on G+ and only G+... who gives a rip? I mean, seriously.
I was going to put some serious effort into G+, kinda use it as a mini-blogging platform, but I don't really care for the anti-hacker mindset that appears to be driving policy there.