This applies to peer feedback as well. Every few months we have to choose peers to evaluate us (not anonymously) and vice versa and the official peer feedback forms always ask for feedback on how the peer could improve. Real feedback isn't provided. You always have to come up with both positive and negative feedback. And obviously nobody wants to be an ass, so the negative feedback is extremely muted or some fake ideas for development are provided. I just want to tell someone and their manager how good a job they did, or in some rare cases help identify issues.
It seems like a farce, really. I also had quarters in which I got glowing peer reviews where folks declined to fill in the development piece, and my very off hands manager came up with some made up generic negative feedback for me that did not come up before.
It seems like a farce, really. I also had quarters in which I got glowing peer reviews where folks declined to fill in the development piece, and my very off hands manager came up with some made up generic negative feedback for me that did not come up before.