>I don't think 4k120 today is in the same market position as 1080p60 5 years ago.
Yeah, I think you're actually right there.
People talk about high-end monitor technology much more than they used to, but I'm not sure how many ordinary people actually have them.
>Once IPS became reasonably available, companies with TN products couldn't push for them as premium products from an image quality perspective.
That's really interesting. I recently changed monitors from 4k60 to 1440p/144Hz under the assumption that the increased frequency would make more of a difference than the additional resolution.
Immediately noticed an inferior quality picture (less pixels aside) - perhaps that's why!
Yeah, I think you're actually right there. People talk about high-end monitor technology much more than they used to, but I'm not sure how many ordinary people actually have them.
>Once IPS became reasonably available, companies with TN products couldn't push for them as premium products from an image quality perspective.
That's really interesting. I recently changed monitors from 4k60 to 1440p/144Hz under the assumption that the increased frequency would make more of a difference than the additional resolution. Immediately noticed an inferior quality picture (less pixels aside) - perhaps that's why!