>Study? You're hoping for a peer-reviewed science journal that published an article on who's offended by Joe Rogan?
Oh, so you have nothing. Thanks for agreeing with me. Your points dismissed.
>The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none."
Not my nor your claim. Stop shifting goal posts.
>I've posted evidence to support mine
Wrong, you've posted none such thing, as I have proven above. You still haven't supplied evidence to support your claim.
>your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host.
Yellow journalism predates the birth of Trump, wrong again.
Oh, so you have nothing. Thanks for agreeing with me. Your points dismissed.
>The original claim was that the total number of people still offended by COVID-victim Joe Rogan's comments was "none."
Not my nor your claim. Stop shifting goal posts.
>I've posted evidence to support mine
Wrong, you've posted none such thing, as I have proven above. You still haven't supplied evidence to support your claim.
>your defense is a thought-terminating cliché coined by a game show host.
Yellow journalism predates the birth of Trump, wrong again.