Comment

Comment by leokennis

For one thing, many governments will have laws about availability of key infrastructure (roads, snail mail, 4G and 5G, wired internet, financial services etc.) which result in resilience decisions:

* Have at least 2 or 3 mobile networks; if 1 fails, people can still dial 112 (911) over the remaining one(s)

* If banks break down, you can still withdraw up to €xyz from an ATM during the emergency

* Even if all mail isn't delivered on all days, letters from the government or letters announcing someone died are still delivered

* If a city is "serviced" by two highways they can't both be closed at the same time

* Etc.

In some countries, governments (or utilities etc.) use WhatsApp in critical processes and communication. So just like the things above, WA should be considered in these contingency plans. Stuff like:

* WhatsApp cannot be the only contact info agencies have - they need at least a backup contact method

* Facebook should announce maintenance activities to WA to these governments in a standardized fashion

* Facebook has to commit to keeping (the main functionality of) WA free of charge

* Etc.

If Facebook doesn't want to commit to stuff like that - fine, but then the consequence should be that WA is no longer considered a valid tool for critical communication, as Facebook then clearly sees it as a "hobby app" that can go down for hours without real consequence.

With great power comes great responsibility.

parent leokennis 5 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton