The thing is, youtube is crappy place for "whistle blowing" because video is a terrible medium for people evaluating information critically - any references a video might have will slip by a person, the general demeanor of a presenter can matter more than their content or credentials, etc.
It's not unreasonable for youtube to refuse non-mainstream health theories even if those theories deserve an airing somewhere.
It's not unreasonable for youtube to refuse non-mainstream health theories even if those theories deserve an airing somewhere.