I have nothing to do with nullc. I'd rather avoid personal attacks if it is OK with you.
> it can represent a single iteration of a larger program which is the point not being acknowledged.
I am actually acknowledging that bitcoin script can (only) represent a single iteration of a larger program. I acknowledge this and claim that this makes it not Turing complete, contrary to the claim in the article.
> it can represent a single iteration of a larger program which is the point not being acknowledged.
I am actually acknowledging that bitcoin script can (only) represent a single iteration of a larger program. I acknowledge this and claim that this makes it not Turing complete, contrary to the claim in the article.