It certainly seems like a plausible argument that better detectors leads to a smaller necessary sample.
> If the most qualified capitalists cannot tell whether a CEO is fraudulent, then it seems that we should alter the CEO appointment system somehow.
Why do you assume the problem is that human beings select CEOs and not that how we select the selectors is broken. That is, maybe the problem is who we decide are "well qualified capitalists"
> If the most qualified capitalists cannot tell whether a CEO is fraudulent, then it seems that we should alter the CEO appointment system somehow.
Why do you assume the problem is that human beings select CEOs and not that how we select the selectors is broken. That is, maybe the problem is who we decide are "well qualified capitalists"