> The post hardly felt pushy to me, and I don’t understand the skepticism of the poster’s intentions.
Two things that lead me to thinking that:
* Blanket statement on censorship without providing further details and references
* Picking a policy that affects a small part of the population and referencing articles that already say that many experts already find problematic
I think it's great that you could read the comment with good intentions, but the way that the details are presented and cherry-picked doesn't sit right with me.
I can only agree to disagree on your point that's just part of how we communicate.
Two things that lead me to thinking that:
* Blanket statement on censorship without providing further details and references * Picking a policy that affects a small part of the population and referencing articles that already say that many experts already find problematic
I think it's great that you could read the comment with good intentions, but the way that the details are presented and cherry-picked doesn't sit right with me.
I can only agree to disagree on your point that's just part of how we communicate.