What Hubble objectively measured wasn't galaxies receding. He measured redshift. Or photon energy loss.
And there's another way to explain this, that is simpler, self-consistent, and doesn't require the concept of "inflation" where apparently space expanded faster than the speed of light.
The explanation: photon hubbling, tired light. That galaxies are frankly right where they are. They're not receding. The photon loses energy. It costs energy to forge a path through spacetime.
And there's another way to explain this, that is simpler, self-consistent, and doesn't require the concept of "inflation" where apparently space expanded faster than the speed of light.
The explanation: photon hubbling, tired light. That galaxies are frankly right where they are. They're not receding. The photon loses energy. It costs energy to forge a path through spacetime.