I have to agree. I was going to counterargue that technically all hacking is executing permissible actions in the sense that the system you're hacking into ends up allowing you to do what you want. That leads to why we have laws around unauthorized access etc., and that leads to digital contracts that need to be interpreted by a human with some ability to enforce their interpretation.
So yes. As the main point of digital contracts seems to be that they are self-enforcing, then it seems to follow that there can be no complaining about the results of using them.
So yes. As the main point of digital contracts seems to be that they are self-enforcing, then it seems to follow that there can be no complaining about the results of using them.