If laws are made behind the veil, then, by definition, they are neutral to the worst off and the best off.
Edit: lots of talk about "if" and "best" and "worst" below. I don't think they're the point. It's about right and wrong regardless of if / best / worst. Sure people have agendas, the aim (which may sometimes / often fail) is to work beyond those agendas.
If laws are made behind the veil, then, by definition, they are neutral to the worst off and the best off.
Edit: lots of talk about "if" and "best" and "worst" below. I don't think they're the point. It's about right and wrong regardless of if / best / worst. Sure people have agendas, the aim (which may sometimes / often fail) is to work beyond those agendas.
For me Rawls is a goal, not a fact.