Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't YC started explicitly to select drastically younger founders at a time when the prevailing narrative was that startup founders should be generally around 30 for optimum likelihood of success?
Given that history, how should we interpret this critique? Has YC failed to evolve alongside the shift in its perception in the startup world?
Given that history, how should we interpret this critique? Has YC failed to evolve alongside the shift in its perception in the startup world?