Why not read the actual Twitter thread and see if the argument has merit? Or engage the summary that the GP brought into the thread instead of pretending the only relevant point in play is the authority of Palmer?
And finally, why not acknowledge that maybe someone who created a coin that took off might have some worthwhile insight?
Why not read the actual Twitter thread and see if the argument has merit? Or engage the summary that the GP brought into the thread instead of pretending the only relevant point in play is the authority of Palmer?
And finally, why not acknowledge that maybe someone who created a coin that took off might have some worthwhile insight?