I think it's easy to say no to any solution, but harder to say "this is bad, but we should do this instead to solve the problem".
In a world with ubiquitous/distributed communication, the ideas that come up would generally avoid direct interception but need some way to identify a malicious transaction.
When saying no to ideas like this, we should at the same time attempt to also share our thoughts on what would be an acceptable alternative solution.
When saying no to ideas like this, we should at the same time attempt to also share our thoughts on what would be an acceptable alternative solution.