But you are right, the process has some flaws. Maybe we can review the dataset automatically on some common errors, once an STT system is ready for a language?
The only other option I can think about is a validation process that includes more people per sentence. Right now, only two people validate a sentence, and if they disagree a third person decides. We could at least double check sentences with one "no" vote one more time.
But you are right, the process has some flaws. Maybe we can review the dataset automatically on some common errors, once an STT system is ready for a language?
The only other option I can think about is a validation process that includes more people per sentence. Right now, only two people validate a sentence, and if they disagree a third person decides. We could at least double check sentences with one "no" vote one more time.