Are we really against preventing serious crimes against public figures? Is that what freedom and privacy is about?
I mean I get the possibility of slippery slope, and I get what protonmail is saying about their service, but come on. This is a death threat on a public figure and his family. Nobody should be protected to do that. Categorical imperative y'all?
I mean I get the possibility of slippery slope, and I get what protonmail is saying about their service, but come on. This is a death threat on a public figure and his family. Nobody should be protected to do that. Categorical imperative y'all?