With all due respect, this view is conversely weak willed, and complacently takes the side of Acti-Blizzard.
The firm directly states they help companies with "union avoidance."
Even charitable interpretations here support "busting" the aims of the union. This isn't an issue where "both sides" are equal in moral standing when one is advocating for better working conditions and the other is legally fighting for more profit
The firm directly states they help companies with "union avoidance."
Even charitable interpretations here support "busting" the aims of the union. This isn't an issue where "both sides" are equal in moral standing when one is advocating for better working conditions and the other is legally fighting for more profit