The article is poorly written and jumps to conclusions on a number of facts. Even the intro is just a jumble of random abstract thoughts like this:
> Also there are famous scientists agree that NP=P. Hilbert, a great mathematician of the twentieth century, has a famous saying: we must know; we will know. It can be seen that Hilbert essentially agreed that NP equals P. Many mathematical problems in human history, including Hilbert's famous 23 mathematical problems, are constantly being solved. Isn't it a confirmation that NP equals P?
If they agree that NP=P, and not many of them do...but if you can't prove it then you can't just say because some people think it is then it is.
The article is poorly written and jumps to conclusions on a number of facts. Even the intro is just a jumble of random abstract thoughts like this:
> Also there are famous scientists agree that NP=P. Hilbert, a great mathematician of the twentieth century, has a famous saying: we must know; we will know. It can be seen that Hilbert essentially agreed that NP equals P. Many mathematical problems in human history, including Hilbert's famous 23 mathematical problems, are constantly being solved. Isn't it a confirmation that NP equals P?
If they agree that NP=P, and not many of them do...but if you can't prove it then you can't just say because some people think it is then it is.