>I strongly disagree with this claim. Can you back your claim with some evidence?
Absolutely. Telegram isn't end-to-end encrypted by default. The author admits so here: https://telegra.ph/Why-Isnt-Telegram-End-to-End-Encrypted-by...
Q.E.D.
This set of 4 vulnerabilities isn't the issue with Telegram. Vulnerabilities can often be patched. The issue is the fundamental way Telegram functions.
Also, since you're obviously going to claim the article justifies it as a design decision, read my refutal here before replying https://telegra.ph/Why-you-should-stop-reading-Durovs-blog-p...
Finally, I'm a bit puzzled, you seem to be "open minded" yet your post didn't even touch on this massive issue of failure to provide E2EE for groups, desktop clients, or anything by default. Were you unaware of it? Or would you argue the endless list of competition that actually does E2EE properly (Signal, Wire, Threema, Element...), over-do security?
You're also not even remotely interested in agreeing with the academic community, but instead just observe and basically imply: "no breaches have been made public, therefore it must be secure". How familiar are you with the field of computer security, do you know how security is quantified?
Absolutely. Telegram isn't end-to-end encrypted by default. The author admits so here: https://telegra.ph/Why-Isnt-Telegram-End-to-End-Encrypted-by...
Q.E.D.
This set of 4 vulnerabilities isn't the issue with Telegram. Vulnerabilities can often be patched. The issue is the fundamental way Telegram functions.
Also, since you're obviously going to claim the article justifies it as a design decision, read my refutal here before replying https://telegra.ph/Why-you-should-stop-reading-Durovs-blog-p...
Finally, I'm a bit puzzled, you seem to be "open minded" yet your post didn't even touch on this massive issue of failure to provide E2EE for groups, desktop clients, or anything by default. Were you unaware of it? Or would you argue the endless list of competition that actually does E2EE properly (Signal, Wire, Threema, Element...), over-do security?
You're also not even remotely interested in agreeing with the academic community, but instead just observe and basically imply: "no breaches have been made public, therefore it must be secure". How familiar are you with the field of computer security, do you know how security is quantified?