What is your source for the 1 billion estimate? Because that seems completely, non-credibly *low* to me.
I also strongly believe that we could cover all our energy needs with renewable sources within a few decades if we really wanted to (even assuming no significant advances in tech), and this seems mostly non-disputed to me (because that is literally what nation-states are currently planning/doing).
> Is there even anything controversial in these statements?
Yes. Your statements seem not credible to me and you cite no sources.
I also strongly believe that we could cover all our energy needs with renewable sources within a few decades if we really wanted to (even assuming no significant advances in tech), and this seems mostly non-disputed to me (because that is literally what nation-states are currently planning/doing).
> Is there even anything controversial in these statements?
Yes. Your statements seem not credible to me and you cite no sources.