What makes it fair and reasonable and does whatever rationale you use here not open up the door to further nativism?
I mean if it is fair and reasonable that Indian transactions should be stored and processed in India, is it not also fair and reasonable that goods sold in India should be made in India, that movies that show in India should be made in India, that all news consumed in India should be written in India?
I get these are not the same, but what is the real difference here? Where does it become unreasonable in my examples and why?
I mean if it is fair and reasonable that Indian transactions should be stored and processed in India, is it not also fair and reasonable that goods sold in India should be made in India, that movies that show in India should be made in India, that all news consumed in India should be written in India?
I get these are not the same, but what is the real difference here? Where does it become unreasonable in my examples and why?