Then i think i was wrong. For me this looks like it _added_ a whole lot of UB and made the rules of object provenance way more complex.
>The real problem is that C users have been lied to.
I think the real problem is that the committee is creating a language that the users neither need nor understand. The users want a language where pointers are, in fact, just address.
>The real problem is that C users have been lied to.
I think the real problem is that the committee is creating a language that the users neither need nor understand. The users want a language where pointers are, in fact, just address.