> They fired Damore for writing an email that was tone-deaf, insensitive, but largely supported by research
Damore was asked for his feedback on Google's diversity policies, and that's exactly what he provided.
Most of Damore's critics haven't actually read his memo[1], but rather formed an opinion based on the character assassination campaign against him, a campaign his employer publicly sided with.
Over the 4 years since the controversy I've asked countless Damore critics to point to the specific part of his memo that was tone-deaf, insensitive, or bigoted. I'm still waiting for an answer.
Damore was asked for his feedback on Google's diversity policies, and that's exactly what he provided.
Most of Damore's critics haven't actually read his memo[1], but rather formed an opinion based on the character assassination campaign against him, a campaign his employer publicly sided with.
Over the 4 years since the controversy I've asked countless Damore critics to point to the specific part of his memo that was tone-deaf, insensitive, or bigoted. I'm still waiting for an answer.
[1] https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-I...