Thanks for the feedback. I've provided a few replies below but I think you have made some great points and I will share them internally.
> - the site does not do a good job of describing the products and what they do.
The page does lead off by telling you it is a software load balancer, but I agree, we can do a better job of giving more information on the product itself. Most people who pursue HAProxy Enterprise are already familiar with HAProxy. With that said, we're actually working on a complete overhaul to this page and I believe the new version will address this.
> - it is hard to find requirements from the first page.
This is just a reference point and typically organizations are working closely with a sales engineer.
> - is there a simpler HA setup than the 3 layer one here:
A simpler version is found under active/standby here [1]
> - the site does not do a good job of describing the products and what they do.
The page does lead off by telling you it is a software load balancer, but I agree, we can do a better job of giving more information on the product itself. Most people who pursue HAProxy Enterprise are already familiar with HAProxy. With that said, we're actually working on a complete overhaul to this page and I believe the new version will address this.
> - it is hard to find requirements from the first page.
This is just a reference point and typically organizations are working closely with a sales engineer.
> - is there a simpler HA setup than the 3 layer one here:
A simpler version is found under active/standby here [1]
[1] https://www.haproxy.com/documentation/hapee/2-2r1/high-avail...