Rant disclaimer. Proceed at your own risk.
I want to like Rust, if only because anything has to be better than C++. C++ is godawful and it sucks that all these decades later it’s what serious big software is written in.
But I haven’t found the explanation of Rust and it’s trade offs and philosophy written by someone who can write serious Haskell and Lisp and C++ and is like “Rust. This is the way. Here’s how and why.”
I’m sure there are much better blog posts than this one that shed light on how parametric as opposed to ad-hoc polymorphism is natural in Rust with no runtime cost. Or how Rust’s nested angle-bracket hell to get a pointer to a piece of memory is actually a deep and profound algebra that exposes std::move for the fraud it actually is or whatever.
Where do I find the explanation of why Rust is less awful than C++ written by someone who has written a lot of C++ out of necessity, doesn’t take non-browser JS seriously, doesn’t think 8 boxes need kube, doesn’t stand to make consulting revenue off having been involved in Cargo, and generally uses C++/Python because they’ve got work to do?
Where do I go to see the light as someone who has some idea how brilliant Eich is and also knows how ridiculous it is to use JavaScript when you’ve got an alternative better than Lua? (I’ve written a JavaScript compiler, I know how unfortunate node.js and Electron are).
I want to be sold! Sell me!
I want to like Rust, if only because anything has to be better than C++. C++ is godawful and it sucks that all these decades later it’s what serious big software is written in.
But I haven’t found the explanation of Rust and it’s trade offs and philosophy written by someone who can write serious Haskell and Lisp and C++ and is like “Rust. This is the way. Here’s how and why.”
I’m sure there are much better blog posts than this one that shed light on how parametric as opposed to ad-hoc polymorphism is natural in Rust with no runtime cost. Or how Rust’s nested angle-bracket hell to get a pointer to a piece of memory is actually a deep and profound algebra that exposes std::move for the fraud it actually is or whatever.
Where do I find the explanation of why Rust is less awful than C++ written by someone who has written a lot of C++ out of necessity, doesn’t take non-browser JS seriously, doesn’t think 8 boxes need kube, doesn’t stand to make consulting revenue off having been involved in Cargo, and generally uses C++/Python because they’ve got work to do?
Where do I go to see the light as someone who has some idea how brilliant Eich is and also knows how ridiculous it is to use JavaScript when you’ve got an alternative better than Lua? (I’ve written a JavaScript compiler, I know how unfortunate node.js and Electron are).
I want to be sold! Sell me!