>It's also worth keeping in mind that living off plants generally kills more total animals (although smaller animals) than living off medium-large animals.
Your net consumption of plants is reduced when you reduce your consumption of animals, friend. How do you figure it would cause the death of more total animals?
>While I assign pretty significant utilitarian value to "stop eating animals", it still falls a few orders of magnitude short of "provide for the health and wellbeing of humans".
People get along just fine eating only legumes and grains and a few other plants sprinkled in.
Your net consumption of plants is reduced when you reduce your consumption of animals, friend. How do you figure it would cause the death of more total animals?
>While I assign pretty significant utilitarian value to "stop eating animals", it still falls a few orders of magnitude short of "provide for the health and wellbeing of humans".
People get along just fine eating only legumes and grains and a few other plants sprinkled in.