> Merely reproducing something is not art, it's direct reproduction. Introducing unique style would be art.
One could then argue that photographs are merely reproduction of reality, and therefore not art. I fail to see why you think photographs introduce unique style but pixel art does not.
> The photo in question was beautifully captured, and the flippant way it's being treated is rather sad.
I apologize for suggesting that you dislike pixel art, but that's how I this sentence reads to me.
One could then argue that photographs are merely reproduction of reality, and therefore not art. I fail to see why you think photographs introduce unique style but pixel art does not.
> The photo in question was beautifully captured, and the flippant way it's being treated is rather sad.
I apologize for suggesting that you dislike pixel art, but that's how I this sentence reads to me.