You praise HN because we can have "meaningful" discussions, yet in the next sentence you ask people not to upvote an article just because the author is not great at communicating his thoughts, and makes some grammar mistakes, completely ignoring the "meaning" of the article.
You feel the need to "urge the people" not to upvote it. However, wouldn't it be more "meaningful" to explain why you do (or do not) agree with what is said, instead of just complaining about grammar?
I personally found the article interesting, even though it's poorly written. Instead of ordering others around, what about urging yourself to refrain from commenting unless you have something meaningful to add to the discussion ;)
You feel the need to "urge the people" not to upvote it. However, wouldn't it be more "meaningful" to explain why you do (or do not) agree with what is said, instead of just complaining about grammar?
I personally found the article interesting, even though it's poorly written. Instead of ordering others around, what about urging yourself to refrain from commenting unless you have something meaningful to add to the discussion ;)