How can you possibly argue that we don't know the "full context" when the full context includes the history of policing in the United States, the rampant historical disregard for citizens rights, and the rapid militarization and infiltration (by white supremacist extremeists) of the police?
How can you possibly argue that we don't know the "full context" when the full context includes the history of policing in the United States, the rampant historical disregard for citizens rights, and the rapid militarization and infiltration (by white supremacist extremeists) of the police?