Insert standard Cory Doctorow style rant about how if Peleton had Open APIs on its devices and its services, anyone could add Apple Watch support without their permission.
From the article:
> But even if it is planning a release later this year, taking away some of the Apple support now could be a strategic tactic to help early adoption.
Is this the type of competition that's good for consumers? Is this a good market outcome that we like to see happening? Or would it be better if Peleton was forced to compete by adding new features to their own smartwatch rather than taking features away from every other platform/device?
From the article:
> But even if it is planning a release later this year, taking away some of the Apple support now could be a strategic tactic to help early adoption.
Is this the type of competition that's good for consumers? Is this a good market outcome that we like to see happening? Or would it be better if Peleton was forced to compete by adding new features to their own smartwatch rather than taking features away from every other platform/device?