Comment

Comment by pdimitar

You do have an excellent point for part of the cases.

We should IMO also entertain one more possibility: namely pressure from the top.

A lot of people who I knew as sympathetic and calm before they took management roles turned into something I could code in one minute: namely a program that asks "how much is this going to take?" and if your answer is above N hours/days then they say "no, we're not doing it". And that's not because they are stupid or suddenly non-sympathetic. It's because their bosses optimize for those metrics and measure them (and their salary, and their bonuses, and even their vacation days) by the same metrics.

Perverted incentives play a big part in the current state of things where everyone just looks baffled at thing X and is like "why in the holy frak isn't this working better?".

Truth is, MANY, and I mean really A LOT of people know that their work is sub-optimal but pressure from above prevents them from making it better.

And people are not independent -- for most people outside IT and other prestige / high-skill professions, standing up to the boss means 3 to 9 months of unemployment and maybe no food on the table. Hence everybody learns to suck it up and do the bare minimum that keeps them employed, perpetuating the cycle.

Multiply that to at least 90% of our world and it's IMO quite easy to understand why it is like it is.

parent pdimitar 5 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton