>> So you paid approx $5* per content page for one of the most boring readings in your entire life, just for the lulz?
> I paid approximately five U. S. dollars per content page for one of the most boring readings in my entire life, just for the lulz.
> Recall that I did not claim to have made a reasonable financial decision. I did not, in fact, make a reasonable (or even defensible) financial decision. This is my way of coping with buyer's regret.
> From what I can tell, they were written with Microsoft Word going by the line breaking and the use of Cambria as font. I don't think I could call it aesthetically pleasing without being insincere, however. Too much is wrong in terms of what I consider to be good typography (which mostly aligns with Butterick's Practical Typography).
> I paid approximately five U. S. dollars per content page for one of the most boring readings in my entire life, just for the lulz.
> Recall that I did not claim to have made a reasonable financial decision. I did not, in fact, make a reasonable (or even defensible) financial decision. This is my way of coping with buyer's regret.
Hahahaha this was my favorite part.
https://old.reddit.com/r/ISO8601/comments/mikuj1/i_bought_is...
edit:
> From what I can tell, they were written with Microsoft Word going by the line breaking and the use of Cambria as font. I don't think I could call it aesthetically pleasing without being insincere, however. Too much is wrong in terms of what I consider to be good typography (which mostly aligns with Butterick's Practical Typography).
At least it's not Arial?