It sounds like you're saying that the quality of some person or organisation's contribution to the web can be judged primarily based on how much money they have to throw at their domain name? That's clearly nonsense.
These people provide no benefit to the web at large, they just game the system for free money. It's a clear example of a tragedy of the commons.
These people provide no benefit to the web at large, they just game the system for free money. It's a clear example of a tragedy of the commons.